Week Ending FRIDAY June 26, 2009---------------------------News Archive / Return to News Alerts
Environmental Cues - Reproductive Timing and Longevity
Implications for improving human health and lengthening lifespan
When humans and animals delay reproduction because food or other resources are scarce, they may live longer to increase the impact of their reproduction, according to a new study by University of Minnesota - published in the June 25 issue of PLoS (Public Library of Science) One.
The discovery might explain why starvation can lead to longer life. It potentially has important implications for improving human health and lengthening lifespan.
The basic idea is that individuals use environmental cues to predict population declines, causing them to delay reproduction until the decline has occurred, and when each subsequent offspring will make a bigger contribution to the gene pool. Likewise, if bad times turn to good times and the population is on the verge of a boom, reproducing sooner rather than later will help their genes thrive.
“If the population is decreasing, future kids make a bigger splash in the gene pool than current kids,” explains Will Ratcliff, a College of Biological Sciences graduate student who came up with the idea for the study. “So, if there are tradeoffs between current and future reproduction, delaying reproduction can be a good idea, even if it reduces the number of kids you have during your lifetime.”
Fluctuations in testosterone levels provide an example of how the environment and organisms interact to guide reproduction, explains R. Ford Denison, adjunct professor in the College of Biological Sciences and Ratcliff’s adviser. Testosterone suppresses the immune system. So when environmental conditions trigger high levels, reproduction is high but longevity drops.
Environmental factors also control the age of menarche. In African countries with chronic food shortages, girls experience menarche (first menstrual period) much later than in the United States, where rich diets trigger early menarche. Food scarcity is a signal that the population is likely to decline, so reproduction is delayed; while an abundance of rich food signals an increase, causing reproductive age to drop.
“Our hypothesis may explain hormesis, the mysterious health benefits of low doses of toxins including those made in broccoli to defend themselves from insects,” says Denison. “When their usual foods are scarce, organisms turn to plants containing chemicals that can suppress reproduction and consequently increase longevity. These toxins may be abundant in ‘famine foods’ that are eaten only when meat and fruit are not available” Denison said.
Graduate student Peter Hawthorne and professor Michael Travisano also co-authored the paper. All four co-authors are in the College of Biological Sciences’ department of ecology, evolution and behavior.