|
Click weeks 0 - 40 and follow fetal growth
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preschoolers' Math Performance Predicts Later Skill Estrogen Reverses Severe Pulmonary Hypertension September 15, 2011--------News Archive Protein In Heart Target for Colon Cancer Therapies Defining Hereditary Deafness Engineers Probe Mechanics Behind Progeria September 14, 2011--------News Archive A Vaccine for TB? Controlling Stem Cell's Form Can Determine Its Fate September 13, 2011--------News Archive Improving Women and Children's Health Worldwide Found: Gene for 3 Child Neurodegenerative Diseases Fast-Paced, Fantasy TV Affects Learning In Children September 12, 2011--------News Archive Common Gene Associated With Aortic Dissection Critical Similarity Between Two Stem Cell Types
|
New research by a team at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) shows that stem cells can be induced to develop into specific cell types by controlling the shape of the scaffold underneath. These results are important to the design of materials needed to induce regeneration of lost or damaged tissues. Tissue engineering seeks to repair or re-grow damaged body tissues, often using stem cells. Stem cells are basic repair units in the body that have the ability to develop into any of several different forms. The NIST experiments looked at primary human bone marrow stromal cells. These are adult stem cells that can be isolated from bone marrow and can "differentiate" into bone, fat or cartilage cells. But how do you ensure that the stem cells turn into the type you need? Chemical cues have been shown to work when researchers identified the proper additivesa hormone in the case of bone cells. Other research has suggested that cell differentiation on flat surfaces can be controlled by patterning the surface to restrict the locations where growing cells can attach. The experiments at NIST are believed to be the first head-to-head comparison of five popular tissue scaffold designs to examine the effect of architecture alone on bone marrow cells without adding any biochemical supplements other than the substrate called cell growth medium. The scaffolds, made of a biocompatible polymer, are only meant to provide a temporary implant to gives cells a firm structure on which to grow and ultimately rebuild tissue. The experiment included microscopic structures looking like clumps of insect-eaten lettuce, freeform - looking like microscopic rods stacked in a crisscross pattern, and electrospun nanofibers looking like a random nest of thin fibers. Bone marrow stromal cells were cultured on each substrate, then analyzed to see which cell groups were most effective at creating deposits of calciuma telltale of bone cell activity. Microarray analysis also was used to determine patterns of gene expression for the cultured cells. The results show that the stem cells will differentiate quite efficiently on the nanofiber scaffoldseven without any hormone additivesbut not so on the other architectures. The distinction between these scaffolds, says NIST biologist Carl Simon, Jr., seems to be shape. Mature bone cells are characteristically long and stringy with several extended branches. Of the five different scaffolds, only the nanofiber one, in effect, forces the cells to a similar shape, long and branched, as they try to find anchor points. Being in the shape of a bone cell seems to induce the cells to activate the genes that ultimately produce bone tissue. "This suggests that a good strategy to design future scaffolds would be to take into account what shape you want to put the cells in," says Simon, adding,"That's kind of a tall order though, you'd have to understand a lot of stuff: how cell morphology influences cell behavior, and then how the three-dimensional structure can be used to control it." Despite the research still to be done on this method, the ability to physically direct cell differentiation by shape alone potentially would be simpler, cheaper and possibly safer than using biochemical supplements, he added. The work was supported in part by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||